General Discussion and Useful Links > The Campfire
Pictures
Ed W:
I guess it's my turn to dispell as much of this as i can. We had our wedding photo's taken at one of these mall phto studios and to my knowledge there's no photoshopping to alter, but to enhance with special effects. We went to the same place she's had her pics taken for me in past months. My Xindi spent an hour in the chair having her hair and face worked on extensively. The lady's pay good money for this and they get the works. The studios have a whole wardrobe full of outfits that they can pin back to make it fit the lady. In our pics, and we should get them today we think, she doesnt own the gowns she wears. They're provided by the studio and pinned up so it's all nice n tight.
All the pics she's taken in past months, I only received a couple compared to the other 20 or so she never even sent me. I swear when I first saw her pics here that I'd never seen before I thought she was a part time model. They are awsome! But that's what they pay for. That kind of result.
Jadams79:
My girls photos were photo shop imports, plus extensive makeup but not an insane wardrobe, the photos she took made her look different, but I have more recent photos without her being all photo shoped and make up out the arse and I say she is damn fine without the touchups lol. :mrgreen: dont embarass your girl with a photo op when she has worked a double, you better tell her she is the most beautiful you have ever seen her too LOL! I think at that moment she could have killed me because she was not expecting a picture at 9am after a double shift lol! :D
Jay W:
I should reiterate that I have no problem with the professional photo places doing the photos, even if clothes seem to be recycled. It is when they digitally alter themselves into mermaids, minnie mouse, pose/dress themselves in ways that scream the exact opposite of "marriage material" that I have to wonder. I also wonder if there is an over eagerness with ladies posing in wedding gowns. I think those are one step away from shooting the "boudoir" pictures at Glamor Shots.
P678056 is one I am not sure how to categorize at first glance. In her profile pics she is suggestive, but not vulgar. The "extra" pic she sent me has her looking like she will be removing her black lace panties any second (she is lifting out her panties' waistband). Who knows, maybe they are getting the ideas from Western magazines.
When I see that, my alarm bells go off. I think this lady might be wanting to scam me. I move on to more sensible ladies (which means I am exclusively talking to just my lady).
My lady just sent me a snapshot of her cooking. She could of saved her money going to that professional, because even in that snapshot, I can tell that she is is ravishing. She is smartly dressed and fully clothed.
Is there anyone here whose initial photos from their lady could be considered "suggestive"? If so, why haven't you shared? :P ;) Jay
Jay W:
Vince:
Then my instincts were right on. Thanks. :D Right now I am collecting these admirer mails more for amusement. :ugeek:
Jay W:
Question just popped into my head...Anybody been scammed by a lady with a video???
Jay
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version