China Romance
General Discussion and Useful Links => Newbies Corner => Topic started by: Thearnidire on December 06, 2013, 04:57:54 pm
-
This is not a pornography web page.You are banned permanently. ;D
-
Yes Mike but I wonder if I can marry her before Maxx kicks them off of here? ::)
Just kidding.
-
Sorry Shaun I got to this guy before you could get her phone number.
-
Pornography Hmm ??! ::) Do you need a pornagram to play it on?
Willy
-
What did I miss? So far reading this makes no sense to me.
-
Gee Mike. I saw the same picture but I didn't see it like you did. I saw a young pretty face and a sexy pose. I didn't see the porno angle. Nevertheless it is good that it was pulled and blocked.
-
That's nothing. I used to get better than that every morning when Jing put on her socks.
-
Sad I missed it. I'm afraid I saw the same version Shaun saw. Mike's version sounds much more...intriguing.
-
Porn beauty is in the eye of the beholder ;)
-
"That's nothing. I used to get better than that every morning when Jing put on her socks."
"Porn beauty is in the eye of the beholder"
Ah Gerry & Philip, the voices of sanity, finally heard above strict constructionism.
-
It's all good!
-
ridiculous ::) :-X
-
, the voices of sanity, finally heard above strict constructionism.
I had to look up as to what constructionism was all about.
'Constructionist learning is inspired by the constructivist theory that individual learners construct mental models to understand the world around them. However, constructionism holds that learning can happen most effectively when people are also active in making tangible objects in the real world. In this sense, constructionism is connected with experiential learning, and builds on Jean Piaget's epistemological theory of constructivism.'
For someone who was born into a world of food rationing, where everyone carried a gas mask and bombs rained down on London almost nightly and TV was not going to be available to the general public for another ten years or so. Then I am still none the wiser. ???
Willy
-
I guess the Willy survival mode trumps everything else.
The point I put across
Strict constructionalism interprets as an 'exact' or 'literal' description. By itself, no problem, but what counts is where that statement stands in relationship to a, or some, social problem defining process.
Strict constructionists cannot make or determine a relatioship, because objectivity cannot exist due to the narrow meaning of the term.
Woman. Blond. Sitting on chair. Legs spread apart. Pulling up the hem on her dress. Young pretty face. PORN.
I did not see the original post, but I have my doubts about it as pornographic.
-
I guess the Willy survival mode trumps everything else.
The point I put across
Strict constructionalism interprets as an 'exact' or 'literal' description. By itself, no problem, but what counts is where that statement stands in relationship to a, or some, social problem defining process.
Strict constructionists cannot make or determine a relatioship, because objectivity cannot exist due to the narrow meaning of the term.
Woman. Blond. Sitting on chair. Legs spread apart. Pulling up the hem on her dress. Young pretty face. PORN.
I did not see the original post, but I have my doubts about it as pornographic.
Well I guess eduction suffered immediately after WW2 well at least mine did!.
But I do know about Porn. Most people were into it following the war.
They would go and porn anything of value, bracelets, wedding rings even their best suits just to get by on.
Willy
-
This is all getting a bit pedantic....... ;D ;D
Pornography is simply defined as: " printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity, intended to stimulate sexual excitement.
So whether or not the alleged photo fitted the prescription of Constructionalism, Determinism or Objectivism....it sure fitted the description of Porn !!!
Whether Porn in a classic sense can be considered guilty of any further Literary crime or a necessary precurser to outrageous anti-social behaviour is surely in the eye and mind of the beholder....and subject to the beady eyes of the Mods...whose determinations will always be obeyed..... ;D ;D ;D
-
I thought I was missing something but now that I know she was just a bright eyed blonde and not a dark eyed Asian I realize I didn't miss a thing... ;D
-
"....it sure fitted the description of Porn"
"I could see it in her eyes!"
you HORNDOGS!
From this day forward, all women stay cloaked!
Good luck with Photoshop.
-
I wonder if they wear thongs under there? :-X
-
John B
Now that really IS porn...you can see actual flesh on 2 of the Women.........enough to start another Jihad I fear !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
D
-
you porn stalkers are on to something....
the U.S. Government has your back!
"Lady Justice" got outed long ago.
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002/01/29/statues.htm
"...ABC News reported that Attorney General John Ashcroft ordered the statues
covered because he didn't like being photographed in front of them..."
It is understood that U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft, under the George W Bush admin,
felt the heat deep within his loins with one of "Lady Justice's" naked breasts lurking just overhead.
Later he announced "there will be no BOOBS in government!"
-
Did this thread turn from a blocked porn to a discussion on what is or is not porn? If anyone is sad they missed a girl with a skirt maybe or maybe not showing something... there is a ton of porn on the internet... If you missed this one pic, you can find thousands... nay, MILLIONS... of pics on the internet.
Let this one go, and let's get back to talking about why we are here... to learn all about the intercultural relationships and all things associcated with them.
-
Here Here. The post immediately above this one is the best one written on this subject.
-
Jeex...Lighten up Guys.....
Now and again, some of the Bros' jump off into irrelevant trivia....it's a laugh, it's healthy, and it's part of the diversity of character and opinion that most of us share as an adjunct to the main objective which is our Chinese Ladies and the respective trials, tribulations, sucesses or failures...the whole nine yards.
The Mods have always worked diligently to make sure that we are all genuine Chinese Partner seekers here, and you can be sure that we are a very diverse bunch....but in the main, we have an underlying sincerity to explore all things Chinese/Chinese Partners. Almost always, the fraudsters et al get culled out by the mods, or laughed out by the bros.....( witness the thread from "new face" who started all this.)
If this (or any) thread goes beyond what is considered appropriate...then the Mods will can it, or it will die a natural death from lack of attention/interest.
There are many, many "serious" threads and posts on the Site......just one little piece of irrelevant trivia aint gonna spell the end of the World as we know it !!!
ps...Shaun...I think "hear, hear" is what you had in mind ? ? ? ;D ;D ;D
-
I stand corrected from the wise man down under.
I agree it is healthy to discuss and talk about this however I do have an issue with those who like to make it into something it isn't and participate in name calling and slamming segment of the population. That isn't necessary or needed here.
-
Most of us go here daily to find something to comment on or laugh at. Anything too stupid will have a short life anyway.
-
The last time I looked, this website is about boy meets girl. It is a captive audience of mostly Western men
with interest in China women.
Where exactly is the convergence, if there is one, between what is art & what is porn.
‘It IS mind over matter’. A woman is supposed to be attractive. A woman is supposed to be sexy.
The survival of the species depends on it. There is a difference between 'seductive'
& 'pornographic'. A few of us don't get it, the rest of us enjoy.
Sharon has the legs.. ;D
-
For those who seem to be too intellectual to understand, there a laws that govern what is considered to be pornographic. For one who said he never saw the picture you seem to be way to obsessed in pointing out the difference between art and pornography.
Bottom line is that a mod thought it was inappropriate for this site, he removed the picture and blocked the individual. Enough said for most on this site.
-
Bottom line is that a mod thought it was inappropriate for this site, he removed the picture and blocked the individual. Enough said for most on this site.
Bottom? Did I miss a bottom? ;D ;D ;D
Yes as Shaun said let's leave it up to the mods to decide. That is what they get paid for isn't it? ::)
Come to think of it. How do newbies now know who are mods or not?
Willy
-
Under every section of the forum, it says who the mods are for that particular section. And don't feel bad, I missed the picture too.
-
OK found it Martin. Does that mean we have a Mod for this thread that has not been moderating for 8 months or more?
Just wondering, to see what I can get away with on this one. ;D ;D ;D
Willy